THIS past week the Democratic Congress
welcomed two MPs from the Alliance 0f
Democrats (AD) party. Mothepu Mahapa
and Mokherane Tsatsanyane joined the
DC after days of speculation and denials
from both of them.
Mahapa has a confl icted relationship
with DC. He re-joins the party he left
three years ago, after being elected as the
MP for the Tele constituency under the
DC fl ag. On the other hand, over the past
year Tsatsanyane crossed from the ABC
to the AD, and then to the DC. He was
voted into parliament under the ABC fl ag
but he left the party after former Prime
Minister Tom Thabane was toppled.
Everyone has the right to choose who
they associate with. Mahapa and Tsatsanyane
are therefore well within their right
to cross over in parliament. However, the
question is will this move the DC and people
living in Stadium Area and Tele constituencies?
What was their real motivation
in joining the DC? Will their defection
ultimately benefi t the party?
The DC has had diffi culty bringing in
good
numbers in urban constituencies, particularly
constituencies in Maseru. Hence
the prospect of having a DC constituency
right at the center of Maseru is very enticing.
Moreover, Mokherane is known to be philanthropic
hence it wouldn’t be stretching it
to surmise that a chunk of Stadium Areas
vote could have been people that were in
support of Mokherane and not because the
Stadium Area is an ABC stronghold. As a
result, the people that voted ABC because
of Mokherane, might vote for DC because of
Mokherane.
However, accepting the two MPs might
also have negative implications for the party
in the long run. We are a year away from
a key election and it would be surprising if
Mokherane and Mahapa won’t want to contest
elections. This can become problematic
in the sense that the expectation is that one
should be a member for at least two years before
they can contest elections as a DC candidate.
Furthermore, it is also probable that people
in the constituency also had a potential
candidate. This is something that can cause
a rift in the party if it is not managed properly.
In addition, it will leave a bad taste in the
mouths of older members if they feel that the
party is extending special favours to these
new members.
e should consider that someone like Mahapa
left the DC at its weakest point and
joined the AD in exchange for a ministerial
position. Obviously staunch members of the
DC felt betrayed by him. If he were to stand
for elections in Tele, I can bet there are people
that won’t vote for him.
Furthermore, it is shocking that someone
could leave a party and in the same term go
back to that party in the absence of confl ict.
It is evident that there were no real issues
that made Mahapa leave the DC. It also
gives the illusion that politicians only look
out for their interests and are uncaring of
what those that voted for them think.
Again, the scenario of MPs crossing the
fl oor not for the benefi t or the interests of the
people is becoming a norm, and the more it
happens, the more it is becoming acceptable.
Soon there will no longer be MPs that quit
parties on the basis of principle because the
party has lost direction or it is going against
the mandate given by the constituency.
I feel like that is the purpose of fl oor crossing,
I don’t think it was intended to allow
MPs a route to wherever the butter is.
This is evident in the case of Tsatsanyane
who left the ABC on account of the ABC
forming government with the DC. This is the
reason I am asking if the two MPs acted on
the basis of principle.
As for the suggestion that these MPs could
be joining the DC in order infi ltrate the party,
with the intention of stunting its growth,
I fi nd it rather far-fetched. I doubt the AD
being out of government would risk looking
weak and unstable, for the purpose of infi
ltrating the DC. The position the AD has
found itself, of losing a member as infl uential
as Tsatsanyane has done more damage
to the party.
In Lesotho, political parties are esteemed
when they are in power. This is to say parties
command recognition and respect when they
are in power. The AD now has limited infl uence
after it was ousted from power. They
wouldn’t add on to their political woes by being
seen losing Tsatsanyane.
The issue of MPs from the AD has both
its upsides and downsides. It gives the DC
numbers and politics is a numbers game. It
reiterates on DC’s slogan that its for all, as it
has accepted two members whom they never
thought could join the DC. The warm reception
they got could attract even more people
to the party.
However, the defections could
also demonstrate the levels
to which our politics have decayed. It shows the greed and
debauchery which have come to defi ne our
politics. MPs appear concerned with what
they can get rather than how they can
serve the people.
The DC, however, shouldn’t throw
caution to the wind. While growing the
political party (through membership) is
key to any political party, the Democratic
Congress should be alive to the fact that
Monyane Moleleki is a political master
strategist, a political cat with years in political
industry.
The above paragraph intends to warn
the DC that the mass infl ux of MPs joining
it may be “sleepers” deployed to “wake” after
the 2022 general elections and head
back to the political formations they initially
defected from!
With coalition governments looking like
will stay with us for the next foreseeable
future this argument is not far-fetched
and how that will be mitigated is incumbent
on the leadership of the DC to actively
guard against, without necessarily
alienating high profi le people to join and
grow the movement.
Another danger is that organisations
can change their organisational culture
through mass infl ux of members joining
from other parties. This infi ltration can
result in changing its congress values, ideology
and norms. Organisational culture
is one of the most important factors of a political party’s success or failure
Each political party has an organisational
culture, and depending on its
strength, the organisational culture may
have a prominent impact on the members
of the organisation, their values and behavior.
The infl ux of new members has the potential
to change the culture of a political
party more especially after change of leadership.
I can only pray and hope that
the DC will protect its culture,
values and ideology.